On stock-stardard books

book of three

I think I have only read The Book of Three by Lloyd Alexander once before – I remember reading it and doing a book presentation on it when I was about twelve. The only other thing I really remember is that it involves a pig running away. So as part of my ‘re-reading’ spree, I decided to give it a re-reading.

While it is enjoyable, I am a bit surprised that this book made the list of 1001 Children’s Books You Must Read Before You Grow Up. Don’t get me wrong, it is a nice read, but it is a bit of a stereotype of an epic fantasy. There is an old enchanter, a good king, a evil king, a fearsome warrior, a princess, a strange, Gollum-like creature (but much more likeable than Gollum)and a bard. Good triumphs and evil is conquered. There isn’t much in this book that says to me ‘You Must Read Me – I am Unique’. It seems a bit of a stock-standard epic fantasy to me.

However, perhaps when the book was first published in 1964 the characters of the old enchanter, the good king, the evil king and so on weren’t so stereotypical. The Book of Three is the first book in a series of five, and in 1966 the second book received a Newbery Honor and the last book won the Newbery Medal in 1969. I haven’t read the other books in the series, so I can’t comment, but The Book of Three doesn’t seem to have anything in it that makes it unusually exciting.

I talked about this briefly when writing about Ash Road – that ideas that were once fresh, original or resonated with people can become overused or stale. The Book of Three doesn’t feel stale – it is still amusing, and quirky, and a good high adventure story – it just doesn’t read as a landmark book. But if anyone has read the other books in the series, I’d love to hear their opinion.

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. Pingback: On where the list of 1001 Children’s Books I Must Read Before I Grow Up (Too Much) comes from | 1001 Children's Books

  2. I’ve read the whole series, and I think I remember having a reaction like yours, including finding Gurgi’s similarity to Gollum. As Taran’s character evolves, the stories get stronger and more complex. Yet I think Susan Cooper’s Dark is Rising series much more exciting and varied — and much shorter!

    • Thanks Lizzie for your comment. I was wondering if perhaps the more interesting aspects of the series came later – perhaps I’ll delve a bit more into the books to find out. And I’m looking forward to reading The Dark is Rising by Susan Cooper – it’s also on the list of 1001 Children’s Books. I must give it a go soon!

  3. Pingback: On why we reread | 1001 Children's Books

  4. I read this in the 70s and enjoyed it after a fashion, but as it was modelled on old Welsh tales which Alexander had grown to love I must admit I prefer to read and re-read the originals in translation (such as The Mabinogion). The same stricture applies to Evangeline Walton’s Mabinogion Tetralogy which always comes highly recommended but which are modern retellings and expansions of the Welsh originals.

    I tried to watch The Black Cauldron, an animation based on the first two of the Alexander books (as I understand), but I’m sorry to say I gave up — it lacked even the charm of Disney’s The Sword in the Stone by which I think it must have been influenced.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: